We claim that parallel programming languages are now developing along the same lines. The advent of data-parallel programming in the 90's introduces structure and abstraction. A parallel composition of sequential processes (PAR/SEQ) is recast into a sequential composition of actions on parallel objects (SEQ/PAR).
The price to pay for this is a possible loss in expressivity and performances. We believe this will be outweighted by major gains:
@INPROCEEDINGS{Bou96ParaDigme,
AUTHOR = {L. Bougé},
BOOKTITLE = {The Data-Parallel Programming Model},
EDITOR = {A. Darte and G.-R. Perrin},
MONTH = jun,
NOTE = {Invited Conference.},
PAGES = {4-26},
PUBLISHER = {Springer Verlag},
SERIES = {LNCS Tutorial},
TITLE = {The Data-Parallel Programming Model: A Semantic Perspective},
VOLUME = {1132},
YEAR = {1996},
URL = {ftp://ftp.ens-lyon.fr/pub/LIP/Rapports/RR/RR96/RR96-27.ps.Z}
}
@INPROCEEDINGS{BouCacLeGUtaVir96,
AUTHOR = {L. Bougé and D. Cachera and Y. {Le~Guyadec} and G. Utard and B. Virot},
BOOKTITLE = {The Data-Parallel Programming Model},
EDITOR = {A. Darte and G.-R. Perrin},
MONTH = jun,
NOTE = {Invited conference.},
PAGES = {252-281},
SERIES = {LNCS Tutorial},
TITLE = {Formal Validation of Data-Parallel Programs: A Two-Component Assertional Proof System for a Simple Language},
VOLUME = {1132},
YEAR = {1996},
URL = {ftp://ftp.ens-lyon.fr/pub/LIP/Rapports/RR/RR96/RR96-29.ps.Z}
}