* Leslie Lamport: (concurrency mailing list, 1988-1990: Flame re distributed processes and granularity) http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Forschung/MCS/Mailing_List_archive/con_hyperarchive_1988-1990/0077.html: I admire philosophers. They have so much to teach us. From Aristotle I learned that heavier bodies fall faster than lighter ones; Kant showed me that nonEuclidean geometry is impossible; and Spinoza proved that there can be at most seven planets. And now, the philosophers on the concurrency mailing list have told me all the things I can't do because I use a logic based on an interleaving model. [About the planets, wasn't it Hegel?] [Actually I think in support of decent philosophers one could propose Descartes, from whom he learnt algebraic geometry; Frege, from whom he learnt the predicate calculus; Turing who showed that termination is undecidable; and now Lamport who has given us a logic based on an interleaving model of concurrency.] Another one: from a footnote of a letter to the editor CACM Nov 1979 In the interests of restoring meaning to our language I will call programs "programs". I urge the ACM to do the same. * David Hilbert, {\em Bull AMS}. {\bf 8}. 102, 437--479. "The deep significance of certain problems for the advance of mathematical science in general and the important role which they play in the work of the individual investigator are not to be denied. As long as a branch of science offers an abundance of problems, so long it is alive; a lack of problems foreshadows extinction or the cessation of independent development. Just as every human undertaking pursues certain objects, so also mathematical research requires its problems. It is by the solution of problems that the investigator tests the temper of his steel; he finds new methods and new outlooks, and gains a wider and freer horizon." * J. von Neumann (1943. ``The Mathematician.'' In Works of the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.) "As mathematics travels far from its empirical source, or still more, if it is a second and third generation only indirectly inspired by ideas coming from ``reality,'' it is beset with very grave dangers. It becomes more and more purely aestheticizing, more and more purely {\em l'art pour l'art}. .... In other words, at a great distance from its empirical source, or after much ``abstract'' inbreeding, a mathematical subject is in danger of degeneration. At the inception the style is usually classical; when it shows signs of becoming baroque, then the danger signal is up.". * George Berkeley (Principles of Human Knowledge, 119): "Arithmetic has been thought to have for its object abstract ideas of Number; of which to understand the properties and mutual habitudes, is supposed no mean part of speculative knowledge. The opinion of the pure and intellectual nature of numbers in abstract has made them in esteem with those philosophers who seem to have affected an uncommon fineness and elevation of thought. It hath set a price on the most trifling numerical speculations which in practice are of no use, but serve only for amusement; and hath therefore so far infected the minds of some, that they have dreamed of mighty mysteries involved in numbers, and attempted the explication of natural things by them. But, if we inquire into our own thoughts, and consider what has been premised, we may perhaps entertain a low opinion of those high flights and abstractions, and look on all inquiries about numbers only as so many difficiles nugae, so far as they are not subservient to practice, and promote the benefit of life" I imagine this spoken in a Leeds or Yorkshire accent; but ISTR he was from Dublin, and probably sounded more like Shane MacGowan. * Anon: The sooner you fall behind, the more time you will have to catch up. The early bird catches the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. * Napier, John b. 1550, Merchiston Castle, near Edinburgh, Scot. d. April 4, 1617, Merchiston Castle From the preface to "Plaine Discovery of the Whole Revelation of St. John" (1593). dedicated to whoever was "your Majesty" in Scotland in 1593. "Let it be your Majesty's continuall study to reforme the universall enormities of your country, and first to begin at your Majesty's owne house, familie and court, and purge the same of all suspicion of Papists and Atheists and Newtrals, whereof this Revelation forthtelleth that the number shall greatly increase in these latter daies." It is difficult to imagine this in any other voice than Ian Paisley's, but he may have sounded something like Stanley Baxter. See also the beautiful http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Bookpages/Napier10.jpeg: * Charles Babbage: "Propose to an Englishman any principle, or any instrument, however admirable, and you will observe that the whole effort of the English mind is directed to find a difficulty, a defect, or an impossibility in it. If you speak to him of a machine for peeling a potato, he will pronounce it impossible; if you peel a potato with it before his eyes, he will declare it useless, because it will not slice a pineapple." - (I saw this in a newsgroup signature, and have not checked it. It appeals to me partly because I regard myself as more Scottish than English.) * The bible: http://www.cforc.com/kjv/1_Corinthians/13.html * John Major, British Tory PM ?? -> ??, about Labour leader Neil Kinnock, a notorious windbag: "The reason he never stops talking is because he's got nothing to say and so he doesn't know when he's said it." * Mark Thorson (I can't remember or discover who he is): "Hopefully, our bones will serve as a source of calcium for whatever superior species comes along to replace us." * Albert Einstein: "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has limits" * Alan Perlis "Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." "In software systems, it is often the early bird that makes the worm."